4.2 Article

Prioritizing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Surgery Quality Improvement

Journal

BREAST JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 127-137

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12707

Keywords

breast cancer; mastectomy; patient-reported outcomes

Funding

  1. University of Washington Medical Center's Department of Surgery Research Reinvestment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast-cancer-specific tools that measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were developed for use in research or clinical practice, and little is known about these tools' performance ability for quality improvement. Furthermore, existing tools may not fully reflect all issues that contribute to quality care as seen by patients. Work is needed to identify and validate patient-reported outcome measures for use in quality improvement in breast cancer surgical care. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study in order to better understand what HRQOL domains and processes of care define high quality surgical care for women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer from both the patient and clinician perspective. We conducted focus groups and one-on-one interviews with 15 women and administered a prioritization questionnaire to participants. We also conducted a prioritization questionnaire among surgical oncologists, general surgeons, and reconstructive surgeons who are members of the Washington State Medical Association. Both the patient and surgeon prioritization questionnaire asked participants to prioritize HRQOL and treatment satisfaction-related aspects of their breast cancer surgical care at key time points before and after mastectomy. A Stakeholder Advisory Panel was convened to review focus group, interview, and prioritization questionnaire results and make recommendations as to patient-reported outcome domains to focus on and existing instruments to use for quality improvement. Patients and clinicians largely agreed on important HRQOL domains, including emotional well-being, education, communication, and process of care. The Stakeholder Advisory Panel, composed of 12 clinicians and five patients, reviewed study findings and existing patient-reported outcomes measurement tools. The panel recommended that the BREAST-Q, a flexible tool with independently validated modules designed for research and clinical care, is an ideal tool to begin developing novel quality improvement benchmarks focused on patient-reported outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system

Elizabeth Austin, Cynthia LeRouge, Andrea L. Hartzler, Courtney Segal, Danielle C. Lavallee

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Translating clinical and patient-reported data to tailored shared decision reports with predictive analytics for knee and hip arthritis

Patricia D. Franklin, Hua Zheng, Christina Bond, Danielle C. Lavallee

Summary: Informatics tools have been developed to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and medical risk factors, generating personalized predictive reports for shared decision-making in clinics. Through iterative interviews with patients and clinicians, the system was refined and implemented in a cluster randomized trial, showing successful patient completion of assessments and positive reception of the report by clinicians and patients.

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Oncology

Patient empowerment through engagement in bladder cancer research

Judy Hamad, John Gore, Stephanie Chisolm, Morgan Powell, Danielle C. Lavallee, Robert Lipman, Nancy Lindsey, Angela Smith

Summary: This study establishes an online learning program for bladder cancer patients to train in research methods specific to bladder cancer, with participants contributing to research topics and studies. The PEER program provides a model for fostering patient engagement in disease-specific research, with potential for broader application in other disease processes and malignancies.

UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences of People Receiving Dialysis

Gwen M. Bernacki, Ruth A. Engelberg, J. Randall Curtis, Manjula Kurella Tamura, Lyndia C. Brumback, Danielle C. Lavallee, Elizabeth K. Vig, Ann M. O'Hare

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2020)

Article Oncology

Patient and public involvement in the design and conduct of a large, pragmatic observational trial to investigate recurrent, high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Angela B. Smith, Jenney R. Lee, Sarah O. Lawrence, Danielle C. Lavallee, Stephanie Chisolm, Doug B. MacLean, Renata K. Louwers, Erika M. Wolff, Larry G. Kessler, Kristin M. Follmer, John L. Gore

Summary: Patient-centered approaches are crucial for diseases with complex treatment decision-making. The article describes patient and public involvement in designing a large observational trial for high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Stakeholders were engaged to prioritize research questions, refine study design, and create an engagement plan. Through intentional involvement, the study aims to produce generalizable results for informed decision-making by patients facing difficult treatment choices.

CANCER (2022)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Family Members? Understanding of the End-of-Life Wishes of People Undergoing Maintenance Dialysis

Fahad Saeed, Catherine R. Butler, Carlyn Clark, Kristen O'Loughlin, Ruth A. Engelberg, Paul L. Hebert, Danielle C. Lavallee, Elizabeth K. Vig, Manjula Kurella Tamura, J. Randall Curtis, Ann M. O'Hare

Summary: The study found that the majority of family members of patients undergoing maintenance dialysis had discussed end-of-life care preferences with the patients, but fewer had discussed stopping dialysis or hospice care. Family members had a fair understanding of patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but lacked detailed understanding of their perspectives on other aspects of end-of-life care.

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY (2021)

Article Surgery

Establishing Clinically Significant Patient-reported Outcomes for Diverticular Disease

Sara Khor, David R. Flum, Lisa L. Strate, Mariam N. Hantouli, Heather M. Harris, Danielle C. Lavallee, Brennan M. R. Spiegel, Giana H. Davidson

Summary: This study established the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for DV-QOL, providing crucial thresholds for measuring the impact of diverticular disease and evaluating treatment effectiveness.

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Association Between Self-reported Importance of Religious or Spiritual Beliefs and End-of-Life Care Preferences Among People Receiving Dialysis

Jennifer S. Scherer, Kaylin C. Milazzo, Paul L. Hebert, Ruth A. Engelberg, Danielle C. Lavallee, Elizabeth K. Vig, Manjula Kurella Tamura, Glenda Roberts, J. Randall Curtis, Ann M. O'Hare

Summary: This study reveals that religious or spiritual beliefs play a significant role in the end-of-life care preferences of adults receiving maintenance dialysis. Those who consider these beliefs important are more likely to favor resuscitation, shared decision-making roles, and less likely to consider stopping dialysis. Addressing these beliefs in care for dialysis patients is crucial for providing holistic care.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Antibiotics versus Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis - Longer-Term Outcomes

Giana H. Davidson, David R. Flum, Sarah E. Monsell, Lillian S. Kao, Emily C. Voldal, Patrick J. Heagerty, Erin Fannon, Danielle C. Lavallee, Bonnie Bizzell, Sarah O. Lawrence, Bryan A. Comstock, Anusha Krishnadasan, Robert J. Winchell, Wesley H. Self, Callie M. Thompson, Farhood Farjah, Pauline K. Park, Hasan B. Alam, Darin Saltzman, Gregory J. Moran, Amy H. Kaji, Daniel A. DeUgarte, Matthew Salzberg, Lisa Ferrigno, Katherine A. Mandell, Thea P. Price, Nicole Siparsky, Jacob Glaser, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, William Chiang, Jesse Victory, Bruce Chung, Damien W. Carter, Matthew E. Kutcher, Alan Jones, Julie Holihan, Mike K. Liang, Brett A. Faine, Joseph Cuschieri, Heather L. Evans, Jeffrey Johnson, Joe H. Patton, Natasha Coleman, Katherine Fischkoff, F. Thurston Drake, Sabrina E. Sanchez, Charles Parsons, Stephen R. Odom, Larry G. Kessler, David A. Talan

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2021)

Article Surgery

Patient Factors Associated With Appendectomy Within 30 Days of Initiating Antibiotic Treatment for Appendicitis

Sarah E. Monsell, Emily C. Voldal, Giana H. Davidson, Katherine Fischkoff, Natasha Coleman, Bonnie Bizzell, Thea Price, Mayur Narayan, Nicole Siparsky, Callie M. Thompson, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, Stephen R. Odom, Sabrina Sanchez, F. Thurston Drake, Jeffrey Johnson, Joseph Cuschieri, Heather L. Evans, Mike K. Liang, Karen McGrane, Quinton Hatch, Jesse Victory, Jon Wisler, Matthew Salzberg, Lisa Ferrigno, Amy Kaji, Daniel A. DeUgarte, Melinda Maggard Gibbons, Hasan B. Alam, John Scott, Lillian S. Kao, Wesley H. Self, Robert J. Winchell, Cassandra M. Villegas, David A. Talan, Larry G. Kessler, Danielle C. Lavallee, Anusha Krishnadasan, Sarah O. Lawrence, Bryan Comstock, Erin Fannon, David R. Flum, Patrick J. Heagerty

Summary: This study aimed to evaluate patient factors associated with undergoing appendectomy within 30 days of initiating antibiotics for appendicitis. The results found that the presence of an appendicolith was associated with a nearly 2-fold increased risk of undergoing appendectomy, while clinical characteristics often used to describe the severity of appendicitis were not associated with the odds of 30-day appendectomy.

JAMA SURGERY (2022)

Article Surgery

Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis

Giana H. Davidson, Sarah E. Monsell, Heather Evans, Emily C. Voldal, Erin Fannon, Sarah O. Lawrence, Anusha Krishnadasan, David A. Talan, Bonnie Bizzell, Patrick J. Heagerty, Bryan A. Comstock, Danielle C. Lavallee, Cassandra Villegas, Robert Winchell, Callie M. Thompson, Wesley H. Self, Lillian S. Kao, Shah-Jahan Dodwad, Amber K. Sabbatini, David Droullard, David Machado-Aranda, Melinda Maggard Gibbons, Amy H. Kaji, Daniel A. DeUgarte, Lisa Ferrigno, Matthew Salzberg, Katherine A. Mandell, Nicole Siparsky, Thea P. Price, Anooradha Raman, Joshua Corsa, Jon Wisler, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, Jesse Victory, Alan Jones, Matthew Kutcher, Karen McGrane, Julie Holihan, Mike K. Liang, Joseph Cuschieri, Jeffrey Johnson, Katherine Fischkoff, F. Thurston Drake, Sabrina E. Sanchez, Stephen R. Odom, Larry G. Kessler, David R. Flum

Summary: This study compared participants in the randomized and self-selection cohorts of the CODA trial, and found similar clinical characteristics and outcomes, suggesting that the results of the randomized trial are generalizable to the wider community.

JAMA SURGERY (2022)

Article Health Policy & Services

Creating a provincial post COVID-19 interdisciplinary clinical care network as a learning health system during the pandemic: Integrating clinical care and research

Adeera Levin, Michelle Malbeuf, Alison M. Hoens, Christopher Carlsten, Christopher J. Ryerson, Alessandro Cau, Stirling Bryan, Jaclyn Robinson, Tamsin Tarling, Joanne Shum, Danielle C. Lavallee

Summary: Research on the long-term impacts of COVID-19 is limited, and the PC-ICCN is a provincial initiative in British Columbia that aims to enhance knowledge and understanding of the sequelae of COVID-19 infection over time. The network includes post COVID-19 Recovery Clinics that provide direct patient care, standardized testing, and education for a minimum of 12 months post enrolment. The PC-ICCN patient registry captures data on all COVID-19 patients with confirmed infection.

LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEMS (2023)

Article Health Policy & Services

Sustaining improvements in relational coordination following team training and practice change: A longitudinal analysis

Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Hebatallah Naim Ali, Nicole Summerside, Danielle C. Lavallee, Benjamin Kragen, Mayumi A. Willgerodt, Bryan J. Weiner, Leah Spacciante, Brenda K. Zierler

Summary: The study aimed to improve communication and coordination in an inpatient heart failure care unit through interventions, resulting in sustained positive changes, especially for nonrotating workgroups. This intervention holds promise for teams seeking best practice models of high-reliability care organization and delivery, representing an important area for future practice-based research.

HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW (2021)

Article Health Policy & Services

A learning health systems approach to integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes across the health care organization

Elizabeth J. Austin, Cynthia LeRouge, Jenney R. Lee, Courtney Segal, Savitha Sanganneswaran, Joseph Heim, William B. Lober, Andrea L. Hartzler, Danielle C. Lavallee

Summary: This study presents guidelines for integrating ePROs into clinical practice within an LHS framework, developed through action research methodology. The guidelines focus on three core thematic areas: governance, integration, and reporting, highlighting the importance of organizational learning, workflow, technology, and knowledge translation in improving patient outcomes within LHS contexts.

LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEMS (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Use of patient-generated health data across healthcare settings: implications for health systems

Elizabeth Austin, Jenney R. Lee, Dagmar Amtmann, Rich Bloch, Sarah O. Lawrence, Debbe McCall, Sean Munson, Danielle C. Lavallee

JAMIA OPEN (2020)

No Data Available