Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
Authors
Keywords
Mammographic density, Breast cancer, Cancer screening, Mammography, Breast
Journal
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 162, Issue 1, Pages 95-103
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-12-25
DOI
10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data
- (2016) Cindy S. Lee et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data
- (2016) Heidi D. Nelson et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
- (2016) Stefanie Weigel et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical–radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them
- (2015) Han Na Lee et al. ACTA RADIOLOGICA
- Identifying Women With Dense Breasts at High Risk for Interval Cancer
- (2015) Karla Kerlikowske et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation
- (2015) Charlotte C. Gard et al. Breast Journal
- Performance of digital screening mammography in a population-based cohort of black and white women
- (2015) Louise M. Henderson et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark
- (2015) Katja Kemp Jacobsen et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Full-Field Digital Mammograms: A Validation Study
- (2014) Albert Gubern-Mérida et al. PLoS One
- Radiologist Assessment of Breast Density by BI-RADS Categories Versus Fully Automated Volumetric Assessment
- (2013) Hye Mi Gweon et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States
- (2013) Karla Kerlikowske ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Automated volumetric breast density estimation: A comparison with visual assessment
- (2013) J.M. Seo et al. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
- Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: Observations in 6 million screens
- (2013) Paula A. van Luijt et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms
- (2012) A Redondo et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
- Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter Study
- (2012) Adriana M. J. Bluekens et al. RADIOLOGY
- Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates
- (2010) Adriana M. J. Bluekens et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program
- (2009) Niamh M. Hambly et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Breast Cancer Screening Results 5 Years after Introduction of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program
- (2009) Nico Karssemeijer et al. RADIOLOGY
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography: Exploratory Analysis of Selected Population Subgroups in DMIST
- (2008) Etta D. Pisano et al. RADIOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation