Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
Volume 47, Issue 9, Pages 2100-2105Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04696-z
Keywords
PSMA PET; Nomogram; PSMA nomogram; Biochemical recurrence; Salvage therapy; PSMA
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose To perform an external validation of a recently published nomogram aimed to predict positive Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) by Rauscher et al. (Eur Urol 73(5):656-661, 2018). Methods Overall, 413 PCa patients with BCR after RP (two consecutive PSA >= 0.2 ng/ml) and PSA value between 0.2 and 1 ng/ml were included. A multivariable logistic regression model was produced to assess the predictors of positive Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. The performance characteristics of the model were assessed by quantifying the predictive accuracy, according to model calibration. Yuden's index was used to find the best nomogram's cut-off. Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify the nomogram's clinical value. Results In the external cohort, the overall detection rate of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT was 44% vs. 64.7% in the original population. At multivariate analysis, PSA at Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT (OR: 7.06, p < 0.001) and ongoing ADT at time of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT (OR: 2.07, p = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of PET/CT positivity. The predictive accuracy of nomogram was suboptimal and comparable to that reported in the original model (64% vs. 67%, respectively). The calibration plot indicated suboptimal concordance. The best nomogram's cut-off to predict positive Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT was 35% (AUC = 0.61). In DCA, the nomogram revealed clinical net benefit when the threshold probabilities of positive Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT is > 35%. Conclusion We assessed similar suboptimal predictive accuracies in the external cohort compared to the original one. PSA and ongoing ADT were confirmed as positive predictors, and the most informative nomogram cut-off resulted 35%.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available