4.3 Review

Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in age-related cognitive decline: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 639-648

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02843-x

Keywords

Age-related cognitive decline; Memory; Executive function; Attention; Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To investigate the role of DHA supplementation in preventing age-related cognitive decline (ARCD) in individual cognitive domains by conducting systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Relevant clinical trials were systematically searched at Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Embase databases since inception to June 2018. The PRISMA guidelines were adhered for data abstraction, quality assessment, and validation of included studies. Study details such as participant characteristics, DHA supplementation, and cognitive function outcome measures, i.e., memory, attention, working memory, and executive function, were extracted to perform meta-analysis according to the Cochrane guidelines. Additional meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to detect confounding variables and sensitivity of results, respectively. Results Ten studies including 2327 elderly individuals were part of the final results. Study exhibited minimal or no pooled incremental effects on memory (0.22, 95%CI = - 0.17 to 0.61, I-2 = 94.36%), attention (0.1, 95%CI = - 0.04 to 0.25, I-2 = 32.25%), working memory (0.01, 95%CI = - 0.10 to 0.12, I-2 = 0%), and executive function (0.03, 95%CI = - 0.05 to 0.11, I-2 = 78.48%) among the DHA-supplemented group. The results from standard mean difference between the groups, on memory (0.08, 95%CI = - 0.12 to 0.28, I-2 = 76.82%), attention (0.04, 95%CI = - 0.09 to 0.23, I-2 = 42.63%), working memory (- 0.08, 95%CI = - 0.26 to 0.10, I-2 = 37.57%), and executive function (0.17, 95%CI = - 0.01 to 0.36, I-2 = 78.48%) were similar to the results of pooled incremental analysis. Lastly, results remained unaffected by sensitivity and sub-group analyses. Conclusions Current pieces of evidence do not support the role of DHA supplementation, in preventing/retarding ARCD of memory, executive function, attention, and working memory. Protocol registered at PROSPERO (ID: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018099401).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available