4.5 Article

Psychological distress and nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study

Journal

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 277, Issue 4, Pages 1211-1217

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05798-y

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Nutrition; Psychological status

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P3-0307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine whether the psychological state of patients with head and neck cancer (HCN) is associated with their nutritional status. Methods In 40 patients with locally advanced HNC treated with definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, psychological and nutritional status were assessed before treatment, at its completion and 3 months' post-therapy. Psychosocial distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (HADS-A, HADS-D), whereas the nutritional status was evaluated using standard methods (Nutritional Risk Screening Tool 2002, anthropometric data, dynamometry and laboratory tests) and with a bioelectrical impedance analysis parameter phase angle (PA). Results Before treatment, more patients were screened positive for anxiety than at treatment completion (p = 0.037) or 3 months' post-therapy (p = 0.083). Depression prevalence was non-significantly higher at the end and after therapy. Compared to the baseline, more cachectic patients and a reduction of PA values were found at successive assessments. Anxiety was more often recorded among malnourished/cachectic patients (assessment 1, p = 0.017; assessment 2, p = 0.020) who were also found more frequently depressed (assessment 2, p = 0.045; assessment 3, p = 0.023). Significantly higher PA values were measured in patients without distress determined at 3 months' post-therapy by the HADS-A (p = 0.027). Conclusion The association between the psychological and nutritional status found in this pilot study and the options for intervention warrants further clarification in a larger prospective trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available