4.7 Article

Lead availability and phytoextraction in the rhizosphere of Pelargonium species

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 32, Pages 39753-39762

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08226-0

Keywords

Lead; Rhizosphere; Hyperaccumulators; Phytoavailability; Oxidative stress

Funding

  1. HEC, Pakistan [1-1/PERIDOT/RD/HEC/201]
  2. Campus France [1-1/PERIDOT/RD/HEC/201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Availability of lead (Pb) in soil is a major factor controlling the phytoremediation efficiency of plants. This study was focused on investigating the plant-induced changes in rhizosphere and corresponding effect on bioavailable fraction of Pb and accumulation in different plant parts. For rhizosphere study, special cropping device was designed locally. Two Pb accumulator plants Stigmatocarpum criniflorum (L. f.) L. Bolus and Pelargonium x hortorum L.H. Bailey were grown in cropping device setup containing Pb spiked soil (500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 mg kg(-1)) for a period of 3 weeks. Further plants were also analyzed for Pb-induced oxidative stress. The results indicated higher ability of soil adjustment for Pb uptake by P. hortorum. The soil pH was (p < 0.05) decreased (Delta pH = - 0.22 pH), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content was significantly increased (by 1.7-fold) in rhizosphere of P. hortorum. The bioavailable fraction of Pb was twofold higher in rhizosphere of P. hortorum than S. criniflorum at the same soil Pb concentration (2000 mg kg(-1)). Maximum Pb concentration in root and shoot of S. criniflorum was 755 +/- 99 and 207 +/- 12 mg Pb/kg DW and for P. hortorum was 1281 +/- 77 and 275 +/- 7 mg Pb/kg DW. P. hortorum uptakes more Pb per plant by threefold compared with S. criniflorum. The oxidative stress results indicated higher Pb tolerance and suitability of P. hortorum for phytoextraction of Pb-contaminated soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available