4.7 Article

Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113131

Keywords

Air quality; Calibration chamber; Low-cost sensors; Particulate matter; Evaluation of calibration chamber

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1646408, 1642513]
  2. ECHO Program, National Institutes of Health [UH3OD023249]
  3. PRISMS Program, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [U54EB021973]
  4. University of Utah Program for Air Quality, Health and Society
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1646408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1642513] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-cost particulate matter (PM) air quality sensors are becoming widely available and are being increasingly deployed in ambient and home/workplace environments due to their low cost, compactness, and ability to provide more highly resolved spatiotemporal PM concentrations. However, the PM data from these sensors are often of questionable quality, and the sensors need to be characterized individually for the environmental conditions under which they will be making measurements. In this study, we designed and assessed a cost-effective (4700) calibration chamber capable of continuously providing a uniform PM concentration simultaneously to multiple low-cost PM sensors and robust calibration relationships that are independent of sensor position. The chamber was designed and evaluated with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model and a rigorous experimental protocol. We then used this new chamber to calibrate 242 Plantower PMS 3003 sensors from two production lots (Batches I and II) with two aerosol types: ammonium nitrate (for Batches I and II) and alumina oxide (for Batch I). Our CFD models and experiments demonstrated that the chamber is capable of providing uniform PM concentration to 8 PM sensors at once within 6% error and with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.771). The study identified two malfunctioning sensors and showed that the remaining sensors had high linear correlations with a DustTrak monitor that was calibrated for each aerosol type (R-2 > 0.978). Finally, the results revealed statistically significant differences between the responses of Batches I and II sensors to the same aerosol (P-value<0.001) and the Batch I sensors to the two different aerosol types (P-value<0.001). This chamber design and evaluation protocol can provide a useful tool for those interested in systematic laboratory characterization of low-cost PM sensors. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available