4.7 Article

Strength and toughness of hybrid steel and glass fiber-reinforced sulfur polymer composites

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116812

Keywords

Fiber-reinforced sulfur composite; Steel fiber; Electric chemical resistant glass fiber; Flexural stress-deflection response; Post-peak toughness

Funding

  1. Mid-career Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea [NRF-2018R1A2B6004546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the effects of microfibers on the compressive and flexural behaviors of modified sulfur composites. Dicyclopentadiene-modified sulfur was used as the binder in the sulfur composites. Fifteen mix cases were tested by varying the volumetric ratios of steel and electric chemical resistant glass fibers. Fly ash (35% by volume) was included to not only increase strength and workability, but also ensure fiber dispersibility in the matrix. A non-contact displacement measurement technique, digital image correlation, was used in flexure tests to monitor the development of high strain zones and micro cracks. The effect of fiber dosage on the porosity of sulfur composites was analyzed by quantifying the pore volume and size distribution through mercury intrusion porosimetry. The test results confirmed that the hybrid use of steel and glass fibers with a volume ratio of up to 4% was effective in improving the flexural stress-deflection response. The post-peak toughness ratio in flexure increased as the volume of microfibers increased. In addition, the total volume of hybrid microfibers generally had a positive correlation with the flexural strength. In contrast, the compressive strength of hybrid fiber-reinforced sulfur composites was more dependent on the portion of steel fibers than glass fibers. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available