4.7 Article

Ignition delay time measurement and kinetic modeling of furan, and comparative studies of 2,3-dihydrofuran and tetrahydrofuran at low to intermediate temperatures by using a rapid compression machine

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages 226-236

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.12.010

Keywords

Rapid compression machine (RCM); Ignition delay time; Furan; 2,3-dihydrofuran; Tetrahydrofuran

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51722603]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Open Research Fund of Beijing Key Laboratory of Powertrain for New Energy Vehicle, Beijing Jiaotong University
  4. China Scholarship Councial [201806280105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low to intermediate temperature (850-1050 K) auto-ignition characteristics of furan, 2,3-dihydrofurn and tetrahydrofuran have been investigated both experimentally and kinetically. The pressure (18 and 33 bar) and equivalence ratio (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0) effects on the auto-ignition of furan were experimentally examined using a rapid compression machine. Compared with alkylated furans, the ignition delay times of furan show notably insensitivity to equivalence ratio. Comparison on the low to intermediate temperature reactivity of furan, alkylated furans, 2, 3-dihydrofuran, and tetrahydrofuran indicates that saturation degree plays a more dominant role in enhancing reactivity than alkyl substitution. Literature mechanisms were validated against present data. Kinetic analyses revealed the major fuel consuming routes and the causes for the deviation between simulation and experimental results. Furthermore, a modified model of furan, 2, 3-dihydrofuran, and tetrahydrofuran was proposed and validated against the ignition delay times in this study as well as experimental data in literatures. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available