4.7 Review

Microbiome Diagnostics

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 68-76

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.303248

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, breakthroughs in sequencing technology and computational biology have provided the basis for studies of the myriad ways in which microbial communities (microbiota) in and on the human body influence human health and disease. In almost every medical specialty, there is now a growing interest in accurate and replicable profiling of the microbiota for use in diagnostic and therapeutic application. CONTENT: This review provides an overview of approaches, challenges, and considerations for diagnostic applications borrowing from other areas of molecular diagnostics, including clinical metagenomics. Methodological considerations and evolving approaches for microbiota profiling from mitochondrially encoded 16S rRNA-based amplicon sequencing to metagenomics and metatranscriptomics are discussed. To improve replicability, at least the most vulnerable steps in testing workflows will need to be standardized and continuous efforts needed to define QC standards. Challenges such as purity of reagents and consumables, improvement of reference databases, and availability of diagnostic-grade data analysis solutions will require joint efforts across disciplines and with manufacturers. SUMMARY: The body of literature supporting important links between the microbiota at different anatomic sites with human health and disease is expanding rapidly and therapeutic manipulation of the intestinal microbiota is becoming routine. The next decade will likely see implementation of microbiome diagnostics in diagnostic laboratories to fully capitalize on technological and scientific advances and apply them in routine medical practice. (C) 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available