4.1 Article

Fungi associated with hibernating bats in New Brunswick caves: the genus Leuconeurospora

Journal

BOTANY
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages 1171-1181

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-2016-0086

Keywords

bats; caves; hibernating; phylogeny; mating

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Wildlife Federation
  2. New Brunswick Wildlife Trust Fund
  3. New Brunswick Environmental Trust Fund
  4. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources
  5. National Speleological Society White-nose Rapid Response Fund
  6. Parks Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two species of Leuconeurospora, Leuconeurospora capsici (J.F.H. Beyma) Malloch, Sigler & Hambleton and Leuconeurospora polypaeciloides Malloch, Sigler & Hambleton (Ascomycota: Pseudeurotiaceae), are reported from the fur and skin of hibernating bats and from other substrata in caves in New Brunswick, Canada. Separate analyses using ITS, RPB1, and RPB2 DNA sequence data are in agreement and show these two species and the type species, Leuconeurospora pulcherrima (G. Winter) Malloch & Cain, form discrete clades within a distinct Leuconeurospora clade. The three species are distinguishable morphologically by their anamorphs, having dark conidia in L. capsici, hyaline conidia in L. polypaeciloides, and no conidia in L. pulcherrima. Ascomata and ascospores are produced in L. pulcherrima and in mated isolates of L. polypaeciloides, but have not been observed in L. capsici. Leuconeurospora species are psychrotolerant, with faster growth and heavier conidial development at 7 degrees C than at 22 degrees C. Of 151 bats sampled from 10 caves, 51 yielded isolates of L. polypaeciloides and 15 yielded L. capsici. The results were not uniform: neither species was isolated from bats in three caves, while three caves yielded isolates of both species and two yielded L. polypaeciloides only. These species were also isolated from cave walls and arthropods in the cave.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available