Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index
Authors
Keywords
-
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Online
2019-12-11
DOI
10.1161/circoutcomes.119.006017
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Fragility Index—P Values Reimagined, Flaws and All—Reply
- (2019) Christopher J. Tignanelli et al. JAMA Surgery
- The fragility of statistically significant findings in randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials: systematic review of the medical literature
- (2018) G. Mazzinari et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- How Fragile Are Clinical Trial Outcomes That Support the CHEST Clinical Practice Guidelines for VTE?
- (2018) Elizabeth Edwards et al. CHEST
- 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
- (2018) Miguel Sousa-Uva et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- The Fragility and Reliability of Conclusions of Anesthesia and Critical Care Randomized Trials With Statistically Significant Findings
- (2018) François Grolleau et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- The fragility of significant results underscores the need of larger randomized controlled trials in nephrology
- (2017) Lani R. Shochet et al. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
- The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey
- (2016) Moin Khan et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- The ASA's Statement onp-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- (2016) Ronald L. Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials*
- (2016) Elliott E. Ridgeon et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey
- (2015) Nathan Evaniew et al. Spine Journal
- 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
- (2014) Stephan D. Fihn et al. CIRCULATION
- The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index
- (2014) Michael Walsh et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
- (2012) Stephan D. Fihn et al. CIRCULATION
- Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review
- (2012) E. A. Akl et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Demystify Statistical Significance--Time to Move on From the P Value to Bayesian Analysis
- (2010) J. J. Lee JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started