4.7 Article

Exploitation of the Cooperative Behaviors of Anti-CRISPR Phages

Journal

CELL HOST & MICROBE
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 189-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.12.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-STG-2016-714478 - EVOIMMECH]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N017412/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust [109776/Z/15/Z]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M018350/1]
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sk1odowska-Curie grant [834052]
  6. Wellcome Trust [109776/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. BBSRC [BB/N017412/1, BB/R010781/1, BB/S017674/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. NERC [NE/M018350/1, NBAF010002] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [834052] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacteriophages encoding anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) must cooperate to overcome phage resistance mediated by the bacterial immune system CRISPR-Cas, where the first phage blocks CRISPR-Cas immunity in order to allow a second Acr phage to successfully replicate. However, in nature, bacteria are frequently not pre-immunized, and phage populations are often not clonal, exhibiting variations in Acr presence and strength. We explored how interactions between Acr phages and initially sensitive bacteria evolve, both in the presence and absence of competing phages lacking Acrs. We find that Acr phages benefit Acr-negative phages by limiting the evolution of CRISPR-based resistance and helping Acr-negative phages to replicate on resistant host sub-populations. These benefits depend on the strength of CRISPR-Cas inhibitors and result in strong Acrs providing smaller fitness advantages than weaker ones when Acr phages compete with Acr-negative phages. These results indicate that different Acr types shape the evolutionary dynamics and social interactions of phage populations in natural communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available