Quantifying differences in cell line population dynamics using CellPD
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Quantifying differences in cell line population dynamics using CellPD
Authors
Keywords
Phenotype digitizer, Growth rate, Net birth rate, Phenotype comparison, Cell population dynamics, Parameter estimation, Computational modeling, Mathematical models, Open source, User friendly, MultiCellDS
Journal
BMC Systems Biology
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-09-21
DOI
10.1186/s12918-016-0337-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- An unbiased metric of antiproliferative drug effect in vitro
- (2016) Leonard A Harris et al. NATURE METHODS
- A high-content image-based method for quantitatively studying context-dependent cell population dynamics
- (2016) Colleen M. Garvey et al. Scientific Reports
- Computational oncology — mathematical modelling of drug regimens for precision medicine
- (2015) Dominique Barbolosi et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Summary of the DREAM8 Parameter Estimation Challenge: Toward Parameter Identification for Whole-Cell Models
- (2015) Jonathan R. Karr et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- grofit: Fitting Biological Growth Curves withR
- (2015) Matthias Kahm et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Protocols and Programs for High-Throughput Growth and Aging Phenotyping in Yeast
- (2015) Paul P. Jung et al. PLoS One
- A framework for parameter estimation and model selection from experimental data in systems biology using approximate Bayesian computation
- (2014) Juliane Liepe et al. Nature Protocols
- Automated method for the rapid and precise estimation of adherent cell culture characteristics from phase contrast microscopy images
- (2013) Nicolas Jaccard et al. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
- BGFit: management and automated fitting of biological growth curves
- (2013) André Veríssimo et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- Growth Rates Made Easy
- (2013) B. G. Hall et al. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
- Facilitating reproducibility
- (2013) Nature Chemical Biology
- A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the Clinic
- (2013) Aaron Mobley et al. PLoS One
- Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research
- (2013) Geir Kjetil Sandve et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Genotype-Environment Interactions Reveal Causal Pathways That Mediate Genetic Effects on Phenotype
- (2013) Julien Gagneur et al. PLoS Genetics
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology
- (2010) Keith A. Baggerly et al. Annals of Applied Statistics
- High content screening: seeing is believing
- (2010) Fabian Zanella et al. TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
- A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics
- (2009) Alexander W Bell et al. NATURE METHODS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now