4.6 Review

Survival and toxicity in neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101945

Keywords

Surgery; Chemotherapy; Radiotherapy; Survival; Toxicity; Treatment; Cervical cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NACT + S) has been compared with definitive chemoradiothherapy (CRT) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in stage 1132, IIA and BB cervical cancer (1994 Figo stage). Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of NACT + S and CRT and identify differences in clinical outcomes and severe toxicity frequency. Methods: The PRISMA statement was applied. Random-effects models were used. Results: Two RCTs representing 1259 patients were identified. NACT + S was not associated with significant OS improvement compared with CRT, with HR of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.86-1.36; p = 0.51). The HR of relapse was 1.32 (95%CI = 1.07-1.62) in favor of CRT. Severe acute toxicity was lower in CRT group. Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed similar OS rates between treatment and CRT superiority over NACT + S in terms of DFS and severe acute toxicity. Impact on long term toxicity and quality of life remain to be proven.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available