4.4 Article

Engineering investigation for the size effect of graphene oxide derived from graphene nanoplatelets in polyurethane composites

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 98, Issue 5, Pages 1084-1096

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23696

Keywords

corrosion resistance; graphene oxide; mechanical property; polymer composite; polyurethane

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, commercial polyurethane (PU) and graphene nanoplatelets (GnP) and their derivative graphene oxide (GO) were used to fabricate PU composites. The size effect of fillers on mechanical properties and anti-corrosion performance of as-prepared composites was thoroughly investigated. It was found that GO was more uniformly dispersed in the PU matrix than GnP due to its compatibility with PU. Furthermore, GO led to the higher mechanical properties and anti-corrosion performance than PU/GnP composites, and the properties were strongly dependant on the size of the GO. Specifically, incorporating large sized GO (GO-M25) in 0.5 wt% indicated the highest average synergetic tensile modulus up to 53% from the neat PU and the lowest corrosion rate of 0.001 MPY (1 MPY = 0.547 g center dot m(-2) center dot d(-1)). This phenomenon was attributed to the fact that the larger size of GO is not only uniformly dispersed within the PU matrix but also enables interaction between PU and GO. Conversely, PU composites incorporated with the small sized GO (GO-C750) did not show elastic behaviour from 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of the filler. This is due to the fact that the high surface area and hydrophilic functionalities of GO-C750 resulted in hard-segment content reduction in PU. This research can help in the design of a PU coating that is physically improved and that has a superior anti-corrosive capacity, particularly for pipelines in the oil-sands transportation industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available