Show cards of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) – do they impact validity? A crossover study
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Show cards of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) – do they impact validity? A crossover study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-02-13
DOI
10.1186/s12889-020-8312-x
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study
- (2018) Kieran P. Dowd et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Dietary Intake and Physical Activity Assessment: Current Tools, Techniques, and Technologies for Use in Adult Populations
- (2018) Holly L. McClung et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Doubly labelled water assessment of energy expenditure: principle, practice, and promise
- (2017) Klaas R. Westerterp EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
- Physical Activity Assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and Doubly Labeled Water
- (2017) ANDREA K. CHOMISTEK et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Accelerometric estimates of physical activity vary unstably with data handling
- (2017) Maia P. Smith et al. PLoS One
- Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations
- (2017) Jairo H. Migueles et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- How Sedentary Are Older People? A Systematic Review of the Amount of Sedentary Behavior
- (2015) Juliet A. Harvey et al. JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
- The Current State of Physical Activity Assessment Tools
- (2015) Barbara Ainsworth et al. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
- Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions
- (2015) Eivind Aadland et al. PLoS One
- Reliability and Validity of the Self- and Interviewer-Administered Versions of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)
- (2015) Anne H. Y. Chu et al. PLoS One
- Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour
- (2014) Claire L Cleland et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Cardiovascular fitness is associated with bias between self-reported and objectively measured physical activity
- (2014) S. A. Tomaz et al. European Journal of Sport Science
- Practical Guide to Measuring Physical Activity
- (2013) Louisa G. Sylvia et al. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Improving Self-reports of Active and Sedentary Behaviors in Large Epidemiologic Studies
- (2012) Charles E. Matthews et al. EXERCISE AND SPORT SCIENCES REVIEWS
- A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
- (2012) Hendrik JF Helmerhorst et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Game interruptions in elite soccer
- (2012) Malte Siegle et al. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
- Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review
- (2011) Paul H Lee et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities
- (2011) BARBARA E. AINSWORTH et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Qualitative Attributes and Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires
- (2010) Caroline B. Terwee et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review
- (2008) Stephanie A Prince et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Why Bland–Altman plots should useX, not (Y+X)/2 whenX is a reference method
- (2007) Jan S. Krouwer STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search