The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC GENOMICS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-01-02
DOI
10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Enhancing Confusion Entropy (CEN) for binary and multiclass classification
- (2019) Rosario Delgado et al. PLoS One
- Computational prediction of diagnosis and feature selection on mesothelioma patient health records
- (2019) Davide Chicco et al. PLoS One
- The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix
- (2019) Amalia Luque et al. PATTERN RECOGNITION
- Phylogenetic convolutional neural networks in metagenomics
- (2018) Diego Fioravanti et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures
- (2018) Davide Ballabio et al. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
- Classifiers and their Metrics Quantified
- (2018) J. B. Brown Molecular Informatics
- Distillation of the clinical algorithm improves prognosis by multi-task deep learning in high-risk Neuroblastoma
- (2018) Valerio Maggio et al. PLoS One
- Local epigenomic state cannot discriminate interacting and non-interacting enhancer–promoter pairs with high accuracy
- (2018) Wang Xi et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Designing multi-label classifiers that maximize F measures: State of the art
- (2017) Ignazio Pillai et al. PATTERN RECOGNITION
- A note on using the F-measure for evaluating record linkage algorithms
- (2017) David Hand et al. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING
- Precision and recall oncology: combining multiple gene mutations for improved identification of drug-sensitive tumours
- (2017) Stefan Naulaerts et al. Oncotarget
- Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric
- (2017) Sabri Boughorbel et al. PLoS One
- A Survey of Predictive Modeling on Imbalanced Domains
- (2016) Paula Branco et al. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
- Enhancer–promoter interactions are encoded by complex genomic signatures on looping chromatin
- (2016) Sean Whalen et al. NATURE GENETICS
- The precision–recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases
- (2015) Brice Ozenne et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Deep learning
- (2015) Yann LeCun et al. NATURE
- The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets
- (2015) Takaya Saito et al. PLoS One
- A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium
- (2014) NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- The disagreeable behaviour of the kappa statistic
- (2014) Laura Flight et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- Area under Precision-Recall Curves for Weighted and Unweighted Data
- (2014) Jens Keilwagen et al. PLoS One
- How to evaluate performance of prediction methods? Measures and their interpretation in variation effect analysis
- (2012) Mauno Vihinen BMC GENOMICS
- A Comparison of MCC and CEN Error Measures in Multi-Class Prediction
- (2012) Giuseppe Jurman et al. PLoS One
- Pearson's correlation coefficient
- (2012) P. Sedgwick BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Small-sample precision of ROC-related estimates
- (2010) B. Hanczar et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Class prediction for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data
- (2010) Rok Blagus et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- Random k-Labelsets for Multilabel Classification
- (2010) Grigorios Tsoumakas et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING
- The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models
- (2010) NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Predictor correlation impacts machine learning algorithms: implications for genomic studies
- (2009) K. K. Nicodemus et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- A novel measure for evaluating classifiers
- (2009) Jin-Mao Wei et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
- (2009) Marina Sokolova et al. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
- Measuring classifier performance: a coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve
- (2009) David J. Hand MACHINE LEARNING
- An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification
- (2008) C. Ferri et al. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
- Classification algorithms for phenotype prediction in genomics and proteomics
- (2007) Habtom et al. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark
- AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
- (2007) Jorge M. Lobo et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Comparison of classification accuracy using Cohen’s Weighted Kappa
- (2006) A BENDAVID EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now