4.4 Article

Staged upper and lower limb lengthening performing bilateral simultaneous surgery of the femur and tibia in achondroplastic patients

Journal

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
Volume 140, Issue 11, Pages 1665-1676

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03360-3

Keywords

Achondroplasia; Lower limb lengthening; Humeral lengthening; External fixator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Surgical lengthening and angular correction of the limbs are an option for treating the orthopedic clinical manifestations in patients with achondroplasia. This study assesses a staged limb lengthening protocol, performing simultaneous bilateral lengthening of the femur and tibia (stage I [S1]), and humeral lengthening (stage II [S2]). Materials and methods Twenty-one achondroplastic patients were included in this study, and 106 segments (34 femurs, 34 tibias and 38 humeri) were lengthened. Achondroplasia patients with a growth curve below the mean of the standard growth curves for achondroplasia were included in S1. The remaining patients were included directly in S2. Variables analyzed included anthropometric measurements, lengthening outcomes, difficulties, and functionality. Results Of the all patients included in the protocol, 15 patients completed S1 and S2, 4 only completed S2, and 2 only completed S1. Height and limb-trunk ratio before S1 were 107.65 +/- 7.14 cm and 1.89 +/- 0.10 and after S1 were 126.50 +/- 9.19 cm and 1.64 +/- 0.09, respectively. Limbs were lengthened 14.43 +/- 1.41 cm (femurs and tibias) for S1 and 9.95 +/- 0.60 cm for S2 (humeri), with a stage healing index of 18.23 +/- 3.54 in S1 and 28.92 +/- 4.42 in S2. Correction of lower angular deviations, functional improvement, and a controlled complications rate were achieved in all patients. Conclusions The limb lengthening protocol proposed in this study is a suitable treatment for achondroplasia patients to achieve the agreed-upon objectives (limb-trunk ratio, improved functionality, and lower limb alignment). The reproducibility of the procedure and patient safety were upheld.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available