4.4 Article

Optical Trapping with Focused Surface Waves

Journal

ANNALEN DER PHYSIK
Volume 532, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/andp.201900497

Keywords

evanescent waves; optical trapping; optothermal effects; surface plasmons; thermal convection

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61427818, 11774330, 91750205, 61427819]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFA0200601]
  3. Science and Technological Fund of Anhui Province for Outstanding Youth [1608085J02]
  4. Anhui Provincial Science and Technology Major Projects [18030901005]
  5. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2340000084]
  7. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2005DP173065-2019-XX]
  8. Zhishan Young Scholar Program of Southeast University
  9. National Institute of Health [R01 GM125976, R21 GM129561]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-field optical trapping can be realized with focused evanescent waves that are excited at the water-glass interface due to the total internal reflection, or with focused plasmonic waves excited on the water-gold interface. Herein, the performance of these two kinds of near-field optical trapping techniques is compared using the same optical microscope configuration. Experimental results show that only a single-micron polystyrene bead can be trapped by the focused evanescent waves, whereas many beads are simultaneously attracted to the center of the excited region by focused plasmonic waves. This difference in trapping behavior is analyzed from the electric field intensity distributions of these two kinds of focused surface waves and the difference in trapping behavior is attributed to photothermal effects due to the light absorption by the gold film.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available