4.6 Article

IL-22 is required for the induction of bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue in tolerant lung allografts

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1251-1261

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15701

Keywords

animal models; murine; basic (laboratory) research; science; immunobiology; lung transplantation; pulmonology; lymph node; lymphocyte biology; tolerance; experimental

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [1P01AI116501]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL094601]
  3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs [1I01BX002730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term survival after lung transplantation remains profoundly limited by graft rejection. Recent work has shown that bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT), characterized by the development of peripheral nodal addressin (PNAd)-expressing high endothelial venules and enriched in B and Foxp3(+) T cells, is important for the maintenance of allograft tolerance. Mechanisms underlying BALT induction in tolerant pulmonary allografts, however, remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the development of PNAd-expressing high endothelial venules within intragraft lymphoid follicles and the recruitment of B cells, but not Foxp3(+) cells depends on IL-22. We identify graft-infiltrating gamma-delta (gamma delta) T cells and Type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) as important producers of IL-22. Reconstitution of IL-22 at late time points through retransplantation into wildtype hosts mediates B cell recruitment into lymphoid follicles within the allograft, resulting in a significant increase in their size, but does not induce PNAd expression. Our work has identified cellular and molecular requirements for the induction of BALT in pulmonary allografts during tolerance induction and may provide a platform for the development of new therapies for lung transplant patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available