4.7 Article

Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810

Keywords

Remote sensing; Evapotranspiration; NLDAS-2; NLDAS-Testbed; Land surface model; Evaluation

Funding

  1. Modeling, Analysis, Predictions and Projections (MAPP) program of NOAA's Climate Program Office (CPO)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877150, 51609111, 41530752]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20100102]
  4. National Key RAMP
  5. D Program of China [2017YFC0403600]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province in China [2018-ZJ-936Q]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) is a major component of the surface hydrological cycle and controls landatmosphere feedbacks by modulating the surface energy budget. Accurate ET quantification at global or regional scales is crucial for understanding variations in carbon and water cycling in a changing environment. Although various grid-based ET data models have been developed using multiple approaches, these vary in concept and physical scheme, leading to differences in performance. We examine uncertainties associated with the limitations of the physics used to assist in model selection and improvement. We evaluate multiple ET data models, including estimates derived from a variety of land surface models (LSMs) based on the operational North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) phase 2 (NLDAS-2) and the experimental NASA LIS-based NLDAS Testbed (NLDAS-Testbed) drivers, and satellite retrievals, compared to water budget-derived ET and tower observations. Overall, all models are able to capture the spatial variability of mean annual water balance-based ET (ETwb) and monthly seasonal cycles of tower ET measurements, although there is a large range of estimates. NOAH28, FLUXNET, SSEBop, LandFlux, and GLEAM perform best, as demonstrated by their higher correlation and smaller bias and RMSE values. Simple relative uncertainty analysis shows that the NLDAS-Testbed ensemble mean has a slightly lower uncertainty than that of the NLDAS-2 ensemble. Our study indicates that NLDAS-Testbed/VIC412 (NLDAS version/LSM version) is improving and NLDAS-Testbed/CLSM is deteriorating relative to NLDAS-2/VIC403 and NLDAS-2/Mosaic. NLDAS-Testbed/NOAH36 and NLDAS-Testbed/NOAHMP36 are comparable to NLDAS-2/NOAH28, although biases between models and ETwb exhibit trends. These findings will help further improvement of these models and support future NLDAS development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available