4.6 Review

Metformin: current clinical applications in nondiabetic patients with cancer

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 3993-4009

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.102787

Keywords

metformin; cancer; nondiabetic patients; prevention; anticancer

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Province [2015TP1009]
  2. Provincial Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province [2018SK2123]
  3. Provincial Key Clinical Specialist Construction Projects of Hunan Province, Key Research and Development Project of Hunan Science and Technology Department [2018SK2126]
  4. Key Project of Changsha Science and Technology Bureau [kq1706046]
  5. Research Project of National Cancer Center Cancer [NCC2017A21]
  6. Research Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province [B2017098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metformin is one of the most commonly used first-line oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Multiple observational studies, reviewed in numerous systematic reviews, have shown that metformin treatment may not only reduce the risk of cancer but may also improve the efficacy of cancer treatment in diabetic patients. Recent studies have been conducted to determine whether a similar protective effect can be demonstrated in nondiabetic cancer patients. However, the results are controversial. The potential optimal dose, schedule, and duration of metformin treatment and the heterogeneity of histological subtypes and genotypes among cancer patients might contribute to the different clinical benefits. In addition, as the immune property of metformin was investigated, further studies of the immunomodulatory effect of metformin on cancer cells should also be taken into account to optimize its clinical use. In this review, we present and discuss the latest findings regarding the anticancer potential of metformin in nondiabetic patients with cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available