"It's probably nothing, but…" Couples' experiences of pregnancy following an uncertain prenatal genetic result
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
"It's probably nothing, but…" Couples' experiences of pregnancy following an uncertain prenatal genetic result
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-01-19
DOI
10.1111/aogs.13813
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- High risk – what's next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret and satisfaction among high‐risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
- (2019) Tanja Schlaikjær Hartwig et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- National screening guidelines and developments in prenatal diagnoses and live births of Down syndrome in 1973-2016 in Denmark
- (2018) Stina Lou et al. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
- Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis
- (2018) Brynn Levy et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Impacts of Variants of Uncertain Significance on Parental Perceptions of Children After Prenatal Chromosome Microarray Testing
- (2018) Preeya Desai et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2018) M. I. Srebniak et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- “They Can't Find Anything Wrong with Him, Yet”: Mothers’ experiences of parenting an infant with a prenatally diagnosed copy number variant (CNV)
- (2016) Allison Werner-Lin et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- “Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results
- (2016) Sarah A. Walser et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents’ Experiences
- (2016) S. L. van der Steen et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing
- (2016) Allison Werner-Lin et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing
- (2015) Sarah A. Walser et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: parental attitudes
- (2015) Eve J. Kalynchuk et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing
- (2014) S.L. van der Steen et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- An Exploration of Genetic Counselors’ Needs and Experiences with Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing
- (2014) Barbara A. Bernhardt et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
- (2014) Sam Riedijk et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results
- (2012) Barbara A. Bernhardt et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations
- (2012) Jill A. Rosenfeld et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal Diagnosis
- (2012) Ronald J. Wapner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- “It’s Challenging on a Personal Level”—Exploring the ‘Lived Experience’ of Australian and Canadian Prenatal Genetic Counselors
- (2010) Melody A. Menezes et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now