4.8 Review

Engineering and Application Perspectives on Designing an Antimicrobial Surface

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages 21330-21341

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b19992

Keywords

antimicrobial; biocide; interface; coating; microbe-resistance

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1843790, 1809229]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [DP2DK111910, R01DK123293]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1809229] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1843790] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infections, contaminations, and biofouling resulting from micro- and/or macro-organisms remained a prominent threat to the public health, food industry, and aqua-/marine-related applications. Considering environmental and drug resistance concerns as well as insufficient efficacy on biofilms associated with conventional disinfecting reagents, developing an antimicrobial surface potentially improved antimicrobial performance by directly working on the microbes surrounding the surface area. Here we provide an engineering perspective on the logic of choosing materials and strategies for designing antimicrobial surfaces, as well as an application perspective on their potential impacts. In particular, we analyze and discuss requirements and expectations for specific applications and provide insights on potential misconnection between the antimicrobial solution and its targeted applications. Given the high translational barrier for antimicrobial surfaces, future research would benefit from a comprehensive understanding of working mechanisms for potential materials/strategies, and challenges/requirements for a targeted application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available