4.4 Article

GenFamClust: an accurate, synteny-aware and reliable homology inference algorithm

Journal

BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0684-2

Keywords

Homology inference; Gene synteny; Gene similarity; Gene family; Clustering; Gene order conservation

Funding

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan
  2. EuroSPIN (Erasmus Mundus joint doctoral program)
  3. Swedish e-Science Research Center (SeRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Homology inference is pivotal to evolutionary biology and is primarily based on significant sequence similarity, which, in general, is a good indicator of homology. Algorithms have also been designed to utilize conservation in gene order as an indication of homologous regions. We have developed GenFamClust, a method based on quantification of both gene order conservation and sequence similarity. Results: In this study, we validate GenFamClust by comparing it to well known homology inference algorithms on a synthetic dataset. We applied several popular clustering algorithms on homologs inferred by GenFamClust and other algorithms on a metazoan dataset and studied the outcomes. Accuracy, similarity, dependence, and other characteristics were investigated for gene families yielded by the clustering algorithms. GenFamClust was also applied to genes from a set of complete fungal genomes and gene families were inferred using clustering. The resulting gene families were compared with a manually curated gold standard of pillars from the Yeast Gene Order Browser. We found that the gene-order component of GenFamClust is simple, yet biologically realistic, and captures local synteny information for homologs. Conclusions: The study shows that GenFamClust is a more accurate, informed, and comprehensive pipeline to infer homologs and gene families than other commonly used homology and gene-family inference methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available