4.4 Article

EHT Constraint on the Ultralight Scalar Hair of the M87 Supermassive Black Hole

Journal

UNIVERSE
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/universe5120220

Keywords

ultralight particles; black hole shadow; event horizon telescope

Funding

  1. FCT-IDPASC Portugal Ph.D. program [PD/BD/114071/2015]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UID/MAT/04106/2019]
  3. CENTRA (FCT) [UID/FIS/00099/2013]
  4. national funds (OE), through FCT
  5. European Union [StronGrHEP-690904, FunFiCO-777740]
  6. COST Action [CA16104]
  7. [PTDC/FIS-OUT/28407/2017]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/FIS-OUT/28407/2017, UID/FIS/00099/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothetical ultralight bosonic fields will spontaneously form macroscopic bosonic halos around Kerr black holes, via superradiance, transferring part of the mass and angular momentum of the black hole into the halo. Such a process, however, is only efficient if resonant-when the Compton wavelength of the field approximately matches the gravitational scale of the black hole. For a complex-valued field, the process can form a stationary, bosonic field black hole equilibrium state-a black hole with synchronised hair. For sufficiently massive black holes, such as the one at the centre of the M87 supergiant elliptic galaxy, the hairy black hole can be robust against its own superradiant instabilities, within a Hubble time. Studying the shadows of such scalar hairy black holes, we constrain the amount of hair which is compatible with the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) observations of the M87 supermassive black hole, assuming the hair is a condensate of ultralight scalar particles of mass mu similar to 10-20 eV, as to be dynamically viable. We show the EHT observations set a weak constraint, in the sense that typical hairy black holes that could develop their hair dynamically, are compatible with the observations, when taking into account the EHT error bars and the black hole mass/distance uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available