4.6 Article

Effects of a Dynamic Injection Flow Rate on Slug Generation in a Cross-Junction Square Microchannel

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr7100765

Keywords

liquid-liquid slug flow; slug generation; dynamic injection flow rate; microchannel; Computational Fluid Dynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51,805,470]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018QNA4013, 2018FZA213]
  3. Youth Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems (Zhejiang University) [SKLoFP-QN-1801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The injection flow rates of two liquid phases play a decisive role in the slug generation of the liquid-liquid slug flow. However, most injection flow rates so far have been constant. In order to investigate the effects of dynamic injection flow rates on the slug generation, including the slug size, separation distance and slug generation cycle time, a transient numerical model of a cross-junction square microchannel is established. The Volume of Fluid method is adopted to simulate the interface between two phases, i.e., butanol and water. The model is validated by experiments at a constant injection flow rate. Three different types of dynamic injection flow rates are applied for butanol, which are triangle, rectangular and sine wave flow rates. The dynamic injection flow rate cycles, which are related to the constant slug generation cycle time t(0), are investigated. Results show that when the cycle of the disperse phase flow rate is larger than t(0), the slug generation changes periodically, and the period is influenced by the cycle of the disperse phase flow rate. Among the three kinds of dynamic disperse flow rate, the rectangular wave influences the slug size most significantly, while the triangle wave influences the separation distance and the slug generation time more prominently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available