4.6 Article

A radiosensitizing effect of RAD51 inhibition in glioblastoma stem-like cells

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2647-9

Keywords

Glioblastoma stem cells; RAD51; Radioresistance; Comet assay

Categories

Funding

  1. Ligue contre le Cancer de la Vienne et des Deux-Sevres, Region Poitou-Charentes, Canceropole Grand Ouest (Reseau Gliomes)
  2. Sport et Collection foundation
  3. Rotary Club de Civray foundation
  4. En avant la vie
  5. Sport et collections

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Radioresistant glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) contribute to tumor recurrence and identification of the molecular targets involved in radioresistance mechanisms is likely to enhance therapeutic efficacy. This study analyzed the DNA damage response following ionizing radiation (IR) in 10 GSC lines derived from patients. Methods: DNA damage was quantified by Comet assay and DNA repair effectors were assessed by Low Density Array. The effect of RAD51 inhibitor, RI-1, was evaluated by comet and annexin V assays. Results: While all GSC lines displayed efficient DNA repair machinery following ionizing radiation, our results demonstrated heterogeneous responses within two distinct groups showing different intrinsic radioresistance, up to 4Gy for group 1 and up to 8Gy for group 2. Radioresistant cell group 2 (comprising 5 out of 10 GSCs) showed significantly higher RAD51 expression after IR. In these cells, inhibition of RAD51 prevented DNA repair up to 180 min after IR and induced apoptosis. In addition, RAD51 protein expression in glioblastoma seems to be associated with poor progression-free survival. Conclusion: These results underscore the importance of RAD51 in radioresistance of GSCs. RAD51 inhibition could be a therapeutic strategy helping to treat a significant number of glioblastoma, in combination with radiotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available