4.6 Article

A statistical model for the analysis of beta values in DNA methylation studies

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1347-4

Keywords

Bounded response variables; DNA methylation; Gamma Regression; Gradient Boosting; HumanMethylation450k BeadChip

Funding

  1. Diet-Body-Brain (DietBB) the Competence Cluster in Nutrition Research - the Federal Ministery of Education and Research [FKZ: 01EA1410D]
  2. German Research Foundation [SCHM 2966/1-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The analysis of DNA methylation is a key component in the development of personalized treatment approaches. A common way to measure DNA methylation is the calculation of beta values, which are bounded variables of the form M/(M + U) that are generated by Illumina's 450k BeadChip array. The statistical analysis of beta values is considered to be challenging, as traditional methods for the analysis of bounded variables, such as M-value regression and beta regression, are based on regularity assumptions that are often too strong to adequately describe the distribution of beta values. Results: We develop a statistical model for the analysis of beta values that is derived from a bivariate gamma distribution for the signal intensities M and U. By allowing for possible correlations between M and U, the proposed model explicitly takes into account the data-generating process underlying the calculation of beta values. Using simulated data and a real sample of DNA methylation data from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall cohort study, we demonstrate that the proposed model fits our data significantly better than beta regression and M-value regression. Conclusion: The proposed model contributes to an improved identification of associations between beta values and covariates such as clinical variables and lifestyle factors in epigenome-wide association studies. It is as easy to apply to a sample of beta values as beta regression and M-value regression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available