4.3 Article

Adipokine gene expression in adipocytes isolated from different fat depots of coronary artery disease patients

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages 261-269

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13813455.2019.1674338

Keywords

Adipokines; adipose tissue; coronary artery disease; mRNA; gene expression

Funding

  1. Complex Program of Fundamental Research of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences [0554-2015-0012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the gene expression levels of adipocytes in different adipose tissues of coronary artery disease patients. It was found that DPP4 and APLN mRNA were higher expressed in epicardial adipose tissue, while ITLN1 gene was overexpressed in this tissue. Additionally, APLN and DPP4 mRNA expression were correlated with blood lipid levels.
To compare DPP4, LCN2, NAMPT, ITLN1, APLN mRNA levels in adipocytes isolated from the biopsies of subcutaneous, epicardial and perivascular fat obtained from 25 patients with coronary artery disease. Gene expression signature was determined by RT-qPCR with hydrolysis probes. We found DPP4 and APLN mRNA was higher expressed only in adipocytes isolated from epicardial adipose tissue compared to the subcutaneous fat. The ITLN1 gene was overexpressed in epicardial adipose tissue compared to both subcutaneous and perivascular tissues. APLN mRNA expression was positively correlated with total and LDL cholesterol plasma level, and DPP4 mRNA expression - with VLDL cholesterol concentration. Thus, adipocytes isolated from different adipose depots are characterised by differential gene expression of adipokines. Epicardial adipose tissue is of particular interest in the context of its function, molecular and genetic mechanisms of regulation of the cardiovascular system and as a therapeutic target for correction of adipose tissue-induced effects on health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available