4.1 Editorial Material

IARC 2019: Night shift work is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6

Keywords

Night work; Shift work; Circadian; Chronodisruption; Cancer; Breast; Prostate; Internal time

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that night shift work is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals and limited evidence from human epidemiological studies. The biological basis from experimental work is clear and compelling: Disturbed chronobiology such as due to alterations in the light-dark schedule which shift-workers experience is associated with carcinogenicity. But is it correct to assume in epidemiological studies that night shift work provides the same dose of disturbed chronobiology to all night workers and that disturbed chronobiology from activities outside of work does not count? Both chronobiological theory and supporting evidence suggest that much-needed future epidemiology should address these questions and should consider disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available