4.7 Article

Postthrombotic syndrome and other outcomes of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in children

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 128, Issue 14, Pages 1862-1869

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-704585

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Comprehensive Research Experience for Medical Students Program/University of Toronto
  2. Yeo Summer Studentship Funding
  3. Department of Hematology/University of Toronto
  4. Sanofi-Aventis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pediatric lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LE-DVT) can lead to postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and other adverse events. We investigated the outcomes of LE-DVT in children. Three groups were compared: non-line-related (Non-LR) DVT, LR DVT in neonates (LRneonates), and LR DVT in non-neonates (LRnon-neonates). A total of 339 children were included (Non-LR, n = 56; LRneonates, n = 95; and LRnon-neonates, n = 188). We found a statistically significant difference in the frequency of PTS (P = .04; 62.5%, 40.0%, and 46.3% in Non-LR, LRneonates, and LRnon-neonates, respectively), of recurrent LE-DVT (P = .001; 10.7% and 2.0% in Non-LR and LRnon-neonates, respectively), and pulmonary embolism (PE) (P < .001; 19.6% and 3.2% in Non-LR and LRnon-neonates, respectively) among groups. There was no difference in DVT resolution (P = .41). Multivariable analysis showed that DVT resolution, triggering event, and sex predicted Modified Villalta Scale (MVS; for pediatric PTS) scores >1; there was an interaction between DVT triggering event and sex. The time to reach an MVS >1 was significantly different when comparing groups (log-rank test, P < .001). Moreover, we found a significant difference in baseline MVS scores among groups, but the difference did not appear to change over time. In conclusion, LR LE-DVT had more benign outcomes than Non-LR DVT. Sex, DVT triggering event, and DVT resolution predicted LE-PTS in our cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available