4.7 Article

Efficient In Vivo Screening Method for the Identification of C4 Photosynthesis Inhibitors Based on Cell Suspensions of the Single-Cell C4 Plant Bienertia sinuspersici

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01350

Keywords

C-4 photosynthesis; Inhibitor; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; pyruvate phosphate dikinase; Bienertia sinuspersici; cell suspension; screening

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2048/1, 390686111]
  2. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [0109532016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of novel herbicides is of crucial importance to modern agriculture. We developed an efficient in vivo assay based on oxygen evolution measurements using suspensions of chlorenchyma cells isolated from the single-cell C-4 plant Bienertia sinuspersici to identify and characterize inhibitors of C4 photosynthesis. This novel approach fills the gap between conventional in vitro assays for inhibitors targeting C-4 key enzymes and in vivo experiments on whole plants. The assay addresses inhibition of the target enzymes in a plant context thereby taking care of any reduced target inhibition due to metabolization or inadequate uptake of small molecule inhibitors across plant cell walls and membranes. Known small molecule inhibitors targeting C-4 photosynthesis were used to validate the approach. To this end, we tested pyruvate phosphate dikinase inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide IV and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase inhibitor okanin. Both inhibitors show inhibition of plant photosynthesis at half-maximal inhibitory concentrations in the sub-mM range and confirm their potential to act as a new class of C-4 selective inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available