The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages 883-889
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-01-29
DOI
10.1111/bju.13439
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97 168 men
- (2015) Daniela Danneman et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- The Will Rogers phenomenon in the staging of breast cancer – Does it matter?
- (2015) G.H. Tan et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer
- (2015) Laurence Klotz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- The Critical Role of the Pathologist in Determining Eligibility for Active Surveillance as a Management Option in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Consensus Statement With Recommendations Supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation
- (2014) Mahul B. Amin et al. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
- Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance
- (2014) Adam B. Weiner et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer--A systematic review
- (2014) Frederik B. Thomsen et al. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer
- (2014) Anna Bill-Axelson et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Optimization of Prostate Biopsy
- (2014) Marc A. Bjurlin et al. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
- The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists
- (2013) Daniel M Berney et al. HISTOPATHOLOGY
- Do Adenocarcinomas of the Prostate With Gleason Score (GS)≤6 Have the Potential to Metastasize to Lymph Nodes?
- (2012) Hillary M. Ross et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
- Impact on the Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer by the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Modified Gleason Grading System
- (2012) Fei Dong et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
- Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer
- (2012) Meelan Bul et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2012) Timothy J. Wilt et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Prostate needle biopsies: interobserver variation and clinical consequences of histopathological re-evaluation
- (2011) KASPER DRIMER BERG et al. APMIS
- The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up
- (2011) Emmanuel S. Antonarakis et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy
- (2011) Scott E. Eggener et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Interactive digital slides with heat maps: a novel method to improve the reproducibility of Gleason grading
- (2011) Lars Egevad et al. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
- EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease
- (2010) Axel Heidenreich et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Grading of Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma on Prostate Needle Biopsy
- (2008) Mathieu Latour et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More