Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-10-28
DOI
10.1186/s12884-019-2518-x
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Non-invasive Prenatal Testing Using Fetal DNA
- (2019) Giulia Breveglieri et al. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy
- Parental experiences after prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality
- (2018) Jan Hodgson et al. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Emotional and cognitive experiences during the time of diagnosis and decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis: a qualitative study of males presented with congenital heart defect in the fetus carried by their pregnant partner
- (2018) Tommy Carlsson et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Effects of ultrasound on anxiety and psychosocial adaptation to pregnancy
- (2018) Sandra Simó et al. Archives of Womens Mental Health
- Women’s Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results
- (2017) Rachèl V. van Schendel et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Decision outcomes in women offered noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for positive Down screening results
- (2017) Tsz-Kin Lo et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Psychological distress in post-partum women after non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan
- (2017) Eri Takeda et al. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
- Clinical, social and ethical issues associated with non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy
- (2017) Blanche Griffin et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- The impact of non-invasive prenatal testing on anxiety in women considered at high or low risk for aneuploidy after combined first trimester screening
- (2017) Zara Richmond et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
- (2016) Andrea C. Tricco et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The effect of different information sources on the anxiety level of pregnant women who underwent invasive prenatal testing
- (2016) Mehmet Çakar et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Women’s Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study
- (2016) Celine Lewis et al. PLoS One
- Knowledge, attitudes and decision-making in Czech women with atypical results of prenatal screening tests for the most common chromosomal and morphological congenital defects in the fetus: Selected questionnaire results
- (2015) Vladana Skutilova BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC
- Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting
- (2014) Heather L. Colquhoun et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- ‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non-invasive prenatal testing
- (2014) Celine Lewis et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
- (2014) Ruth Farrell et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about Down syndrome: A qualitative research study
- (2012) Denise M. Levis et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started