4.6 Article

Boosted structured additive regression for Escherichia coli fed-batch fermentation modeling

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 321-334

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26073

Keywords

recombinant protein production; Escherichia coli; structured additive regression model; boosting; modeling; machine learning

Funding

  1. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality of biopharmaceuticals and patients' safety are of highest priority and there are tremendous efforts to replace empirical production process designs by knowledge-based approaches. Main challenge in this context is that real-time access to process variables related to product quality and quantity is severely limited. To date comprehensive on- and offline monitoring platforms are used to generate process data sets that allow for development of mechanistic and/or data driven models for real-time prediction of these important quantities. Ultimate goal is to implement model based feed-back control loops that facilitate online control of product quality. In this contribution, we explore structured additive regression (STAR) models in combination with boosting as a variable selection tool for modeling the cell dry mass, product concentration, and optical density on the basis of online available process variables and two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopic data. STAR models are powerful extensions of linear models allowing for inclusion of smooth effects or interactions between predictors. Boosting constructs the final model in a stepwise manner and provides a variable importance measure via predictor selection frequencies. Our results show that the cell dry mass can be modeled with a relative error of about +/- 3%, the optical density with +/- 6%, the soluble protein with +/- 16%, and the insoluble product with an accuracy of +/- 12%. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 321-334. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available