4.8 Article

Use of liposomal amplifiers in total internal reflection fluorescence fiber-optic biosensors for protein detection

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 1201-1207

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.012

Keywords

Liposomes; Protein detection; Evanescent wave-excited fluorescence; Fiber-optic biosensors

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technolog [98-2627-B-007-001, 102-2628M-002-004-MY4, 103-2811-M-002-163]
  2. Taiwan Ministry of Education Aim for the Top University Plan [EMRP-D1A0751]
  3. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPD290092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evanescent-wave excited fluorescence technology has been demonstrated to enhance sensitivity and reduce matrix effects, making it suitable for biosensor development. In this study, we developed a liposome-based, total internal reflection fluorescence, fiber-optic biosensor (TIRF-FOB) for protein detection, which integrates a liposomal amplifier and sandwich immunoassay format with TIRF-FOB. In addition, the antibody-tagged and fluorophore-entrapped liposomes for heterogeneous detection of target molecules were designed and synthesized. This biosensor successfully detected the target protein (model analyzed here is IgG) with a limit of detection (LOD) of 2.0 attomoles for the target protein (equivalent to 2.0 pg/mL of protein presented in 150 mu L of sample solution). The features of this ultrasensitive liposomal TIRF-FOB are (i) fluorescence is excited via evanescent waves and amplified via liposomes; (ii) the use of two polyclonal antibodies in the sandwich assay format increases the specificity and lowers the cost of our assay. Based on the exceptional detection sensitivity and cost-effectiveness, we believe that the proposed biosensor has great potential as a practical, clinical diagnostic tool in the near future. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available