4.7 Article

Determination of a natural (17β-estradiol) and a synthetic (17α-ethinylestradiol) hormones in pharmaceutical formulations and urine by adsorptive stripping voltammetry

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 297, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126728

Keywords

17 beta-estradiol (E2); 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2); Pharmaceutical formulations; Human urine; Adsorptive stripping voltammetry

Funding

  1. Fondecyt [1171189, 11170701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An efficient, fast and sensitive method for the determination of 17 beta-estradiol, (E2) and 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in pharmaceutical formulations and in urine was developed and validated using a hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE), screen printed carbon electrodes (SPCE), and screen printed carbon nanotube electrodes (SPCNTE). Both analyzes are adsorbed on the working electrodes. To obtain sensitive and selective methods, the effects of various parameters such as pH, adsorption potential, and time (E-ads, t(ads)) were optimized. The optimum experimental conditions chosen for the two analyzes were pH: 10.0; E-ads: - 0.60 and t(ads): 30 s, when HMDE was used. Under these conditions, one reduction signal was found at -1.31 V for E2 and two reduction signals at - 0.23 V and -1.20 V for EE2. The detection limits (DLs) were found to be 0.3 mu g L-1 for E2, 14.8 mu g L-1 for EE2 at - 0.23 V, and 9.7 mu g L-1 for EE2 at -1.20 V. On the other hand, in screen printed electrodes E2 and EE2 present oxidation of the phenolic hydroxyl groups at 0.30, 0.31, 0.32, and 0.33 V (pH:10) with DLs of 242, 277; 182, and 191 mu g L-1 for SPCE and SPCNTE, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the determination of these analyzes in Primaquin (R) (E2), Gynera (R) (EE2), spiked urine (with EE2), and urine samples of women who used Tinelle (R) (EE2) as contraceptive drug.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available