4.6 Article

Suppression of neointima formation by targeting β-catenin/TCF pathway

Journal

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20160229

Keywords

beta-catenin; gene therapy; neointima formation; restenosis; Wnt

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [PG/09/068]
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/11/77/29110] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronary artery disease is treated by vein grafting and stent implantation. Late vein graft failure and restenosis of stented arteries reduce the success rates of these approaches and are caused by neointima formation. We have previously shown that Wnt proteins are up-regulated during intimal thickening, and have speculated that these lead to activation of downstream genes with beta-catenin/T-cell factor (TCF)-responsive promoters. In the present study, we aimed to provide evidence that beta-catenin/TCF signalling promotes neointima formation and assess whether targeting this pathway has potential for reducing neointima formation. We utilized a gene therapy approach selectively targeting cells in which the beta-catenin/TCF pathway is activated by using a recombinant adenovirus Ad-TOPTK, which carries a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) gene under the control of a beta-catenin/TCF-response promoter. Cells with activated beta-catenin will therefore be selectively killed. Ad-TOPTK and ganciclovir (GCV) treatment significantly suppressed the growth of the neointima in a murine model of left carotid artery ligation. In summary, we demonstrated that Wnt/beta-catenin/TCF signalling promotes neointima formation, by showing that the selective death of cells with activated beta-catenin suppressed neointima formation. This highlights the therapeutic potential for reducing late vein graft failure and in-stent restenosis by targeting beta-catenin/TCF signalling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available