Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volume 116, Issue 51, Pages 25535-25545
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Online
2019-11-26
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1910951116
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Psychology's Renaissance
- (2018) Leif D. Nelson et al. Annual Review of Psychology
- Progress on reproducibility
- (2018) Jeremy Berg SCIENCE
- Comparing methods for estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data from health care databases
- (2018) T. Wendling et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.
- (2018) Gregory M. Walton et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
- Psychologically authentic versus inauthentic replication attempts
- (2016) Christopher J. Bryan et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Reply to Bryan et al.: Variation in context unlikely explanation of nonrobustness of noun versus verb results
- (2016) Alan S. Gerber et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- A field experiment shows that subtle linguistic cues might not affect voter behavior
- (2016) Alan S. Gerber et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Reply to Inbar: Contextual sensitivity helps explain the reproducibility gap between social and cognitive psychology: Table 1.
- (2016) Jay J. Van Bavel et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious
- (2016) Yoel Inbar PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
- (2016) Jay J. Van Bavel et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
- (2016) D. T. Gilbert et al. SCIENCE
- Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
- (2016) C. J. Anderson et al. SCIENCE
- Response to Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines"
- (2015) A. Cimpian et al. SCIENCE
- Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines"
- (2015) D. K. Ginther et al. SCIENCE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
- (2014) R. Chris Fraley et al. PLoS One
- Two Failures to Replicate High-Performance-Goal Priming Effects
- (2013) Christine R. Harris et al. PLoS One
- Behavioral Priming: It's All in the Mind, but Whose Mind?
- (2012) Stéphane Doyen et al. PLoS One
- Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self
- (2011) C. J. Bryan et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started