4.8 Article

Two major accretion epochs in M31 from two distinct populations of globular clusters

Journal

NATURE
Volume 574, Issue 7776, Pages 69-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1597-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. W. M. Keck Foundation
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT160100206]
  3. University of Sydney
  4. University of Edinburgh
  5. Royal Society of New Zealand
  6. French National Research Agency
  7. Australian Research Council [FT160100206] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large galaxies grow through the accumulation of dwarf galaxies(1,2). In principle it is possible to trace this growth history via the properties of a galaxy's stellar halo(3-5). Previous investigations of the galaxy Messier 31 (M31, Andromeda) have shown that outside a galactocentric radius of 25 kiloparsecs the population of halo globular clusters is rotating in alignment with the stellar disk(6,7), as are more centrally located clusters(8,9). The M31 halo also contains coherent stellar substructures, along with a smoothly distributed stellar component(10-12). Many of the globular clusters outside a radius of 25 kiloparsecs are associated with the most prominent substructures, but some are part of the smooth halo(13). Here we report an analysis of the kinematics of these globular clusters. We find two distinct populations rotating perpendicular to each other. The rotation axis for the population associated with the smooth halo is aligned with the rotation axis for the plane of dwarf galaxies that encircles M31. We interpret these separate cluster populations as arising from two major accretion epochs, probably separated by billions of years. Stellar substructures from the first epoch are gone, but those from the more recent second epoch still remain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available