4.7 Article

The Vascular Disrupting Agent CA4P Improves the Antitumor Efficacy of CAR-T Cells in Preclinical Models of Solid Human Tumors

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 75-88

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.10.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Beijing Science and Technology Major Project [D171100000517004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31521004, 81874166]
  3. National Science and Technology Support Project [2014BAI02B01]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013ZX10001003003]
  5. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2014ZT05S216]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2014B020226001]
  7. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2016B030232001]
  8. Peking University Clinical Medicine + X Special Project [PKU2017LCX10]
  9. Ministry of Education of China (111 Project)
  10. BeiHao Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Translational Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy remains relatively ineffective against solid tumors due to inadequate infiltration and in vivo expansion of CAR-T cells. Unlike hematological malignancies, solid tumors have vascular barriers that hinder CAR-T cells from reaching the tumor site. Here, we demonstrated that combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P), a vascular disrupting agent (VDA), can significantly improve the infiltration ability of CAR-T cells in solid tumors as evidenced by elevated levels of IFN-gamma. Moreover, combined treatment with CA4P and CAR-T cells greatly increased the therapeutic efficiency of the CAR-T cells in subcutaneous ovarian cancer mouse xenograft models and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of colon and ovarian carcinoma. Our findings highlight CA4P as an effective antitumor agent candidate for combination with CAR-T cells in clinical applications to treat solid tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available