4.5 Article

Postoperative Serum C-Reactive Protein Level Predicts Long-term Outcomes in Stage I Gastric Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 242, Issue -, Pages 323-331

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.075

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Inflammation; C-reactive protein; Prognostic factor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative systemic inflammation in patients with stage I gastric cancer. Methods: This study reviewed the medical records of 470 patients with stage I gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. The postoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3 and its peak value were evaluated as prognostic factors. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was performed to determine their cutoff values. Results: The CRP level on POD 3 (P = 0.001) and the peak CRP level (P = 0.007) were significantly associated with the overall survival rate. In the multivariate analysis, the CRP level on POD 3 (P = 0.002) and the peak CRP level (P = 0.008) were identified as independent predictors of the overall survival. The high CRP on POD3 group had significantly higher mortality rate from relapse of gastric cancer (P = 0.001) and infectious disease (P = 0.003) than the low CRP on POD 3 group. The CRP level on POD 3 was significantly associated with the patient sex, surgical procedure, duration of the operation, amount of blood loss, postoperative infectious complication, and peak CRP level. Conclusions: The serum CRP level during the early postoperative period predicts the long-term outcomes in stage I gastric cancer. The present study suggests a significant influence of postoperative systemic inflammation on the survival of patients with stage I gastric cancer. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available