4.5 Article

Preoperative systemic inflammatory markers are prognostic indicators in recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 8, Pages 1450-1455

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.25760

Keywords

adrenocortical cancer; lymphocyte; monocyte; recurrence

Funding

  1. NIH Clinical Center
  2. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has a poor prognosis with minimal clinical and biochemical factors to guide management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of systemic inflammatory response in patients with recurrent ACC. Methods Patients who underwent resection for recurrent ACC were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and mean platelet volume were calculated. Results Twenty-five patients (age at operation 52.2 +/- 9.5 years) were identified. We observed a statistically significant shorter disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with LMR less than 4 (41 +/- 7.4 months vs 71 +/- 12.3, P = .023) and male sex (26.6 +/- 4.2 months vs 57.6 +/- 9.5 months, P = .079), while time-to-recurrence (TTR) less than 12 months (40 +/- 7.7 months vs 70.3 +/- 13.1 months, P = .059) had a trend on univariate analysis for worse DSS. On multivariable analysis, LMR < 4 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-14.76; P = .027) and TTR less than 12 months (HR 2.77 95% CI: 1-7.62; P = .049) were found to be significantly associated with worse DSS. Conclusion Preoperative LMR greater than 4 and TTR greater than 12 months are associated with longer DSS. Patients with LMR greater than 4 and TTR greater than 12 months may benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach and may require less frequent surveillance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available