4.7 Article

Whisking Asymmetry Signals Motor Preparation and the Behavioral State of Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 49, Pages 9818-9830

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1809-19.2019

Keywords

attention; cortical state; decoding behavior; motor planning; somatosensory cortex; vibrissae

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [327654276-SFB 1315, 2112280105, LA 3442/3-1, LA 3442/5-1]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [670118]
  3. Euratom research and training program 2014 -2018 [670118]
  4. H2020 Research and Innovation Programme [720270/HBP SGA1, 785907/HBPSGA2, 670118/ERC ActiveCortex]
  5. Einstein Stiftung
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [670118] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central function of the brain is to plan, predict, and imagine the effect of movement in a dynamically changing environment. Here we show that in mice head-fixed in a plus-maze, floating on air, and trained to pick lanes based on visual stimuli, the asymmetric movement, and position of whiskers on the two sides of the face signals whether the animal is moving, turning, expecting reward, or licking. We show that (1) whisking asymmetry is coordinated with behavioral state, and that behavioral state can be decoded and predicted based on asymmetry, (2) even in the absence of tactile input, whisker positioning and asymmetry nevertheless relate to behavioral state, and (3) movement of the nose correlates with asymmetry, indicating that facial expression of the mouse is itself correlated with behavioral state. These results indicate that the movement of whiskers, a behavior that is not instructed or necessary in the task, can inform an observer about what a mouse is doing in the maze. Thus, the position of these mobile tactile sensors reflects a behavioral and movement-preparation state of the mouse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available