4.5 Article

Long term results of primary radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages 247-255

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03290-0

Keywords

Acoustic neuroma; Gamma knife; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Vestibular schwannoma; hearing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a primary option for management for both newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas (VS), as well as VS that enlarge after initial observation. Methods A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained data base found 871 patients who underwent Gamma knife (R) SRS as their initial (primary) management between 1987 and 2008. Follow-up ranged from 1-25 years (median = 5.2 years) Median tumor volume was 0.9 cc (0.02-36) and median margin dose was 13 Gy (12-25). Results Progression free survival (PFS) after SRS was 97% at 3 years, 95% at 5 years, and 94% at 10 years. Freedom from delayed surgical resection was found in 98.7% of patients. Smaller tumor volume was significantly associated with improved PFS. There were 326 patients with serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson 1 or 2) at the time of SRS with audiological follow-up of >= 1 year. Serviceable hearing preservation rates after SRS were 89.8% at 1 year, 76.9% at 3 years, 68.4% at 5 years, 62.5% at 7 years, and 51.4% at 10 years. Factors associated with improved serviceable hearing preservation included younger age, Gardner-Robertson grade 1 at SRS, and absence of subjective complaints of dysequilibrium or vertigo (vestibulopathy). Fifty-one patients (5.8%) developed trigeminal neuropathy. Fourteen (1.6%) developed a transient House-Brackmann grade 2 or 3 facial neuropathy. Conclusions In this report with extended follow-up, primary SRS achieved tumor growth control in 94% of patients. Optimization of long- term cranial nerve outcomes remains an important achievement of this management strategy for VS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available