Automatically Appraising the Credibility of Vaccine-Related Web Pages Shared on Social Media: A Twitter Surveillance Study
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Automatically Appraising the Credibility of Vaccine-Related Web Pages Shared on Social Media: A Twitter Surveillance Study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages e14007
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Online
2019-09-03
DOI
10.2196/14007
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
- (2019) Nir Grinberg et al. SCIENCE
- The association between quality measures of medical university press releases and their corresponding news stories—Important information missing
- (2019) Maike Winters et al. PLoS One
- Toward Real-Time Infoveillance of Twitter Health Messages
- (2018) Jason B. Colditz et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Prevalence of Disclosed Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research and Associations With Journal Impact Factors and Altmetric Scores
- (2018) Quinn Grundy et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Public Perception Analysis of Tweets During the 2015 Measles Outbreak: Comparative Study Using Convolutional Neural Network Models
- (2018) Jingcheng Du et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- The science of fake news
- (2018) David M. J. Lazer et al. SCIENCE
- The spread of true and false news online
- (2018) Soroush Vosoughi et al. SCIENCE
- Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate
- (2018) David A. Broniatowski et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation
- (2018) Heidi J. Larson NATURE
- Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States
- (2017) Adam G. Dunn et al. VACCINE
- Rumor Gauge
- (2017) Soroush Vosoughi et al. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
- Geographic and demographic correlates of autism-related anti-vaccine beliefs on Twitter, 2009-15
- (2017) Theodore S. Tomeny et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Understanding Vaccine Refusal
- (2016) Mark Dredze et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Characterizing Twitter Discussions About HPV Vaccines Using Topic Modeling and Community Detection
- (2016) Didi Surian et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- The spreading of misinformation online
- (2016) Michela Del Vicario et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Associations Between Exposure to and Expression of Negative Opinions About Human Papillomavirus Vaccines on Social Media: An Observational Study
- (2015) Adam G Dunn et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Greater freedom of speech on Web 2.0 correlates with dominance of views linking vaccines to autism
- (2015) Anand Venkatraman et al. VACCINE
- Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review
- (2014) Kapil Chalil Madathil et al. Health Informatics Journal
- The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study
- (2014) P. Sumner et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study
- (2012) Amélie Yavchitz et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with Online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Control
- (2011) Marcel Salathé et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak
- (2010) Cynthia Chew et al. PLoS One
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started