Journal
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 1487-1496Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26959
Keywords
deep learning; multiple sclerosis; MRI; segmentation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background The dependence of deep-learning (DL)-based segmentation accuracy of brain MRI on the training size is not known. Purpose To determine the required training size for a desired accuracy in brain MRI segmentation in multiple sclerosis (MS) using DL. Study Type Retrospective analysis of MRI data acquired as part of a multicenter clinical trial. Study Population In all, 1008 patients with clinically definite MS. Field Strength/Sequence MRIs were acquired at 1.5T and 3T scanners manufactured by GE, Philips, and Siemens with dual turbo spin echo, FLAIR, and T-1-weighted turbo spin echo sequences. Assessment Segmentation results using an automated analysis pipeline and validated by two neuroimaging experts served as the ground truth. A DL model, based on a fully convolutional neural network, was trained separately using 16 different training sizes. The segmentation accuracy as a function of the training size was determined. These data were fitted to the learning curve for estimating the required training size for desired accuracy. Statistical Tests The performance of the network was evaluated by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and lesion true-positive and false-positive rates. Results The DSC for lesions showed much stronger dependency on the sample size than gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). When the training size was increased from 10 to 800 the DSC values varied from 0.00 to 0.86 +/- 0.016 for T-2 lesions, 0.87 +/- 009 to 0.94 +/- 0.004 for GM, 0.86 +/- 0.08 to 0.94 +/- 0.005 for WM, and 0.91 +/- 0.009 to 0.96 +/- 0.003 for CSF. Data Conclusion Excellent segmentation was achieved with a training size as small as 10 image volumes for GM, WM, and CSF. In contrast, a training size of at least 50 image volumes was necessary for adequate lesion segmentation. Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1487-1496.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available