Journal
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 57-65Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00645-5
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Complications; High power; Esophageal damage; Pulmonary vein isolation; Radiofrequency
Categories
Funding
- Spanish Society of Cardiology (Dr. Pedro Zarzo Clinical Research Project 2014)
- Spanish Society of Cardiology (Bayer Clinical Research Project 2018)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Clinical Research Project 2018) [PI18/01522]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by point-by-point radiofrequency application (PPRF) results in longer procedures than that achieved by single-shot ablation techniques. In addition, it is associated with significant risk of oesophageal injury. The POWER-FAST pilot study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PVI by high-power short-duration (HPSD) PPRF. Methods HPSD PPRF around the PVs was done in 48 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation. Fifty watts was delivered until a predefined lesion index value was reached (LSI >= 5 or Abl-I >= 350) and 60 W during 7-10 s in the first 18 and last 30 patients, respectively. A control group of 47 consecutive patients who had undergone PVI before the HPSD group with conventional PPRF (30 W for 30 s) was included for reference. Echocardiography and oesophageal endoscopy was performed shortly after ablation in all patients. Results PVI of all targeted veins was achieved in 98% and 100% of patients of the conventional and HPSD groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Total radiofrequency time was 34 +/- 11, 24 +/- 8, and 15 +/- 5 min in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W (p < 0.001). Audible steam pops occurred in 4 out of 48 (8%) patients in the HPSD group, accounting for 4 (0.08%) out of 5 269 HPSD radiofrequency applications. No patient in the HPSD group developed pericardial effusion. The incidence of oesophageal lesions was 28%, 22%, and 0% in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W, respectively (p = 0.007) Conclusions PVI can be achieved with HPSD PPRF in most patients. This approach appears safe and associated with low risk of esophageal damage.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available